The newest Columnist on www.thepapare.com. Our very own Umhar Samsudeen reporting from the 'Land down under'
Every time a national team of any sport that does well, it gets all the support with the whole nation being behind them.
This is especially true when Sri Lanka or India are winning cricket. But sadly it doesn’t occur in the same manner when the result favours the opposition. Most if not many supporters turn their backs against their teams and starts the ‘Blame Game’ finding various reasons, conduct post mortems to find out and point the finger at certain individuals or groups for the loss or failures or their teams performances. Haphazard blame is laid on some poor soul, sometimes giving encouragement to needless action from the administration at times.
What the supporters fail grasp is that if they were put in similar situation as the players or administrators for that matter, what would they do? Will it make much of a difference?
Taking a look at the year that passed us by, India and Sri Lanka ended meeting each other in the final of cricket’s most prestigious event, the ICC Cricket World Cup where India ended as winners in a game which had quite a twist with Sri Lanka making a mammoth total for a final and getting two big breakthroughs of the ‘Little Master’ himself SachinTendulkar and the very explosive Virender Sehwag but still being unable to defend it.
Yes, it does bring many thoughts to the minds of supporters and also other folks who follow the game. However coming back to the point, during this period the streets in every part of the world was crowded with Indian fans celebrating their victory of the world cup after a 28 year wait.
In the meantime Sri Lanka was also in a dominant position in the ICC ODI rankings which meant that Sri Lanka was also doing considerably well. Of course fans were disappointed at the fact that they lost to the neighbouring nation. But nevertheless Sri Lanka was good enough to make the finals by taking down some strong opposition.
However taking a look at the current situation where the Lankans and Indians have being putting up horrible performances like being bowled out for 46 and losing three games in a row of which two were finished even before half the due days of the game ended, most fans have started to turn their backs at the teams they support. When speaking to a few cricket fanatics most of them blamed either the captaincy or the lack of commitment by the players. This can be heard more often than not by fans who do not follow the game passionately or the ones who follow the game just to be ‘in the scene’.
What many people fail to understand is that, even in life it is a cycle that keeps going around. Like players, teams too face bad patches and it becomes very much visible especially when the poor performances come after a great series prior to the slump.
In Sri Lanka’s case more than half the population blames T.M Dilshan for poor captaincy on and off the field. Well I personally feel that it is wrong to point the finger at an individual particularly like Dilshan who gives 100% on the field. If some of the people who blame him were in his shoes would there have been a change in the outcome I wonder?
Whilst understanding the fact of going through a rough period as a team we must also consider the fact that Dilshan took up the captaincy when nobody else was willing to take up the role. In addition the fact of the team being in a re-building stage specially after the retirement of some of the key players or players who carried a massive amount of weight of the team on their shoulders such as Murali, Vaas and not forgetting the legendary Sanath Jayasuriya is also one of the major factors that any team would have to face.
Even the mighty Aussies faced a bit of a tough time when Hayden, Warne, Gilchrist and McGrath retired within a short span of time they did struggle to find replacements as good as them in the initial stages. But thanks to their structure of cricket that runs in the domestic circles they did not take too long to adapt to the situation and make necessary changes to get back on track. As of now they are on a dream run and they also have the luxury of a great set of cricketers coming through the ranks even to replace the ones who have been sidelined by injury even after putting up good performances. Quick bowler Pat Cummins who had a great start to his career with a five wicket haul against South Africa but was unfortunate to get injured. His replacement James Pattinson continued from where Cummins left by ending up with 25 wickets in the four tests he played until he was struck with injury.
Even when taking a look at the scenario the Indian cricket team is currently facing, they have all the big names in the likes of Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman Dhoni and Sehwag who are with no doubt some of the greatest cricketers in the history of the modern game who have put up splendid performances to make their nation proud but all of them seem to be having a bad patch at the moment which any cricketer would face.
Unfortunately for India they all seem to face it at the same time. Due to this factor many Indian fans I met in Australia at the moment have either stopped watching cricket or doesn’t want to talk about cricket simply because the Indians are in a massive rut where they seem unable to come out of. The behaviour and the chat of the fans were not the same during the period where the world cup was taking place and after. All they spoke about was how they are the greatest in the world. I personally had to face some criticism and also a fair dose of sledging while playing cricket by many people where the Indians take a special place in that lot.
Deviating from cricket, I have seen many English or British supporters who follow and are proud of their football teams and are not afraid to say that they still do and always will support their team regardless of the outcome of the game. Now they are real supporters.
However the question that arises out of this matter of the reaction of fans or supporters who hail from the sub continent puzzles me. If they are real supporters of the game of glorious uncertainties they really should be ready for the uncertainties that come with the game. So who are the real fans?
Sumsudeen is currently coaching a premiership winning Australian domestic side ‘Taipans’ and was a former U-17 and U-19 Junior national cricket representative.
The world has moved in to a scenario where everything that takes place is so fast paced that change and adapting to the changes have become words that are used more frequently than not. Change is inevitable.
However in order to sustain and survive in a particular environment, accepting and adapting to the necessary changes have become the most important aspects in today’s context. The ones who fail to accept and resist changes do not last for long.
Similarly in the sporting arena changes take place in several forms. The players involved in the sport have to make sure that they adapt to the changes that occur. The sportsmen/women who resist the new changes will most often than not get dropped from their teams or even go to the extent of risking their entire sporting career.
When taking a look at the cricketing arena in the past few years, many changes have taken place mainly with the intention of improving the game and also the entertainment aspect among the crowds. A decade ago Twenty20 cricket was just being introduced in the UK but today, it has become the most popular format out of the three. Big hits by the batsmen, variations in deliveries by the bowlers, strategic field placements and bowling options by captains have made Twenty20 cricket an exhilarating form of cricket. In addition the fact the shorter game can fit in easily to the busy schedule of the spectator has also become a key factor in its popularity.
The professionalism of a cricketer is brought to test when they have to change their style of play once they are picked for a series which includes all three formats. However the ones who can be tagged as ‘cricket smart’ are the ones with the knowhow to adapt in accordance with the situation.
A recent try-out to one day cricket; the use of a ‘Super Sub’ just faded away as it did not become very popular among teams. On the other hand the introduction of ‘Power Plays’ which took place at the same time has become a ‘game changer’. The Power play rule has made teams look for scores or chase targets which were highly impossible a decade ago. Also a lot of hard hitting has come into the game and the bats used in the modern game of cricket have changed significantly. Thick edged bats have taken batting to a new dimension, where run scoring is not as hard as it used to be and when bowlers come out with their variations, the batsmen do have advantage over them.
Likewise even Test cricket has changed in a very entertaining manner where most games end with a result instead of a boring draw. A batting team’s run rate in a test game has improved immensely from around 2 runs per over to a range of 3 to 3.5 or even 4 runs per over. This means the batsmen have higher strike rates than ever before. A good batsman in Test cricket was determined when he had a strike rate of around 60 runs every 100 balls. But now it has improved to 80 plus per 100 balls.
Cricket has become very result oriented since of late, which I think is a very positive approach and a great step taken by all the teams and administrators involved in the cricketing circles around the globe. The administrators have taken a new step in limited over cricket to use two new balls from either end to give bowlers an advantage in a very batsmen dominated game.
All these new changes taking place has given an element of excitement not only to the players but also to the spectators and the fans involved with this lovely game.
However the biggest question that arises for the nations playing the game, is how the players adapt and adjust to the new rules and regulations that come though as changes. It is quite obvious that the ones who adapt the best will remain in the teams but the administrators such as managers and selectors face a tough situation as they would have to leave out a few players in order to make room for newer players, but the risk that they face is how would the new players adapt to the situation and will they be able to sustain themselves in the game for long? I know many would think that the same process should be followed. If they fail, bring in someone new... But what would happen to the team’s balance and the combinations the captains and coaches look for? Will the replacements be good enough to perform the same job?
Change comes further into play when a team goes overseas on tour, especially to another region they need to learn to adapt to changes in the weather conditions, pitch conditions, swing/spin etc. For example in the recently concluded test series between the Aussies and the Indians, the latter was smashed in the series as they failed to adapt to fast bouncy pitches. They would have to expect that as the Aussies know that teams from the sub continent are not that great players of pace bowling with swing and bounce and will bombard them with such. Same happens when the Aussies or the Englishmen travel to the sub continent they have to adapt to dry conditions and spinning pitches.
Adapting and adjusting to any type of change is the most important or key factor. May it be sustaining a player’s spot in the team or continuing a winning streak in another country, a team has to quickly adjust to change, instead of talking and making unnecessary remarks like the ones which took place when the Border-Gavaskar series was taking place.
News Flash |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Latest Comments
|
||
|
Copyright © 2010 ThePapere.com. All Rights Reserved Solution by ultimax.lk
|